WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
 Are we ready to celebrate the 1700th year of the anniversary of the Nicene Creed?

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:12.000
! Do we all have that on our calendars?

00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:20.000
! Celebration at Roll's house.

00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:28.000
 Alright, well, it's a joy to gather together. It's 9 o'clock. I'm going to jump right in.

00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:39.000
 So, in this class, welcome, we are going to dive into our rich heritage by looking at the creeds.

00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:47.000
 Christians from the very beginning have been answering the question that Jesus poses to each one of us,

00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:53.000
 who do you say that I am? And creeds come out of that question.

00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:57.000
 Creed's come from the Latin term credo, I believe.

00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:03.000
 Or perhaps better translated, I believe and give my heart to.

00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:07.000
 Expressing a profound commitment of the heart.

00:01:07.000 --> 00:01:12.000
 And thought to be the first Christian creed is the simple statement,

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:14.000
 Jesus is Lord.

00:01:14.000 --> 00:01:22.000
 Coming out of the loyalty oaths where the Roman Emperor would demand that everyone declare that Caesar is Lord.

00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:27.000
 Christians would stand firm and confess, no, Jesus is Lord.

00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:30.000
 Probably the first Christian creed.

00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:38.000
 In his introduction to mere Christianity, Lewis provides an analogy which I think will be helpful in our time together.

00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:43.000
 He writes, think of creeds as the hall of a large house.

00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:47.000
 Those truths that are central to all true Christians.

00:01:47.000 --> 00:01:52.000
 In the hallway of the house are doors opening to several rooms.

00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:56.000
 And these rooms are furnished with fires and chairs and meals.

00:01:56.000 --> 00:01:59.000
 So those rooms represent denominations.

00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:04.000
 So you don't live in the hall. You don't camp out in the hall.

00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:07.000
 You have to choose a room.

00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:10.000
 So creeds don't tell us everything that we need to know.

00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:16.000
 But creeds are the central truths that unite all true Christians in all ages.

00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:22.000
 And creeds have been a part of the church since the very beginning, longer than John Newton's Law of Gravity.

00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:26.000
 So Newton's Law is already out of date, I hear, with quantum physics.

00:02:26.000 --> 00:02:30.000
 But these creeds, still withstanding the test of time.

00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:37.000
 Providing frameworks for the big C church to help preserve those things that are at the heartbeat of our faith.

00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:42.000
 And so this class, we're going to be exploring these creeds.

00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:52.000
 This one in particular, as we begin, is going to be more of a preliminary introduction, a prologue.

00:02:52.000 --> 00:03:00.000
 Where we need to establish some presuppositions before moving into the specific creeds.

00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:06.000
 And so one of those preliminary items we need to discuss together is sola scriptura.

00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:13.000
 And for us to have a really good, firm grasp of that doctrine and how creeds relate to the doctrine of the scripture.

00:03:13.000 --> 00:03:18.000
 So before we dive in, let me pray.

00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:22.000
 And we'll dive into this together.

00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:28.000
 Father in heaven, Lord, we thank you that you have preserved your church.

00:03:28.000 --> 00:03:31.000
 The gates of hell have not prevailed against it.

00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:38.000
 Lord, we pray that we would stand firm on the truth, on the good deposit that has been passed to us.

00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:46.000
 Lord, we pray that we would guard those truths with our lives, in our hearts, in our church.

00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:55.000
 Lord, we pray that we would just find valuable the rich work of faithfulness that you have done in your people's midst.

00:03:55.000 --> 00:03:59.000
 Be with us. We covet your spirit, Lord.

00:03:59.000 --> 00:04:01.000
 Would your spirit be among us.

00:04:01.000 --> 00:04:06.000
 Help us for these truths to seep deep into our hearts.

00:04:06.000 --> 00:04:09.000
 And we pray this in Jesus' name.

00:04:09.000 --> 00:04:10.000
 Okay.

00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:12.000
 So let me give you a road map.

00:04:12.000 --> 00:04:17.000
 So today we're going to be talking about the doctrine of sola scriptura.

00:04:17.000 --> 00:04:23.000
 And then in these next classes, Tom and John are going to dive into the specific creeds.

00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:27.000
 So we're going to be talking about the earlier creeds before Nicaea.

00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:35.000
 We'll talk about the Council of Nicaea, the Apostles' Creed, the creeds in Constantinople and Ephesus,

00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:40.000
 the creed at Chalcedon, and then we'll conclude with creeds for today.

00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:45.000
 Like, what role do creeds still have in our life as a church together?

00:04:45.000 --> 00:04:54.000
 So as we think about sola scriptura, frankly, many Christians are confused about how this relationship works.

00:04:54.000 --> 00:05:03.000
 I mean, if we really adhere and find a creed valuable, isn't that compromising to the scripture being our authority?

00:05:03.000 --> 00:05:06.000
 How do those two things work?

00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:14.000
 And my prayer is that I want us to prize the scripture above all else coming out of this class.

00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:21.000
 But I want you to think of the creed not as a rival, but as a hearing aid.

00:05:21.000 --> 00:05:29.000
 A hearing aid where we're not bypassing the text, but the creeds help us to hear the text better.

00:05:29.000 --> 00:05:36.000
 So when we look at the creeds, we're putting a hearing aid on and we're listening, and we're actually seeing things in the text.

00:05:36.000 --> 00:05:42.000
 So let's dive right in.

00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:51.000
 So why should we Christians in the 21st century study ancient texts written more than a millennia ago?

00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:56.000
 Let me give you at least three reasons why we're teaching this class now.

00:05:56.000 --> 00:05:57.000
 First...

00:05:57.000 --> 00:06:00.000
 How long is this like a parenting class?

00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:01.000
 Good question.

00:06:01.000 --> 00:06:02.000
 That's going to be next week.

00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:03.000
 Next week?

00:06:03.000 --> 00:06:04.000
 Yes.

00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:05.000
 Of course.

00:06:05.000 --> 00:06:09.000
 So everyone, there's a parenting class next week starting.

00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:14.000
 But this will be a good foundation for good parenting.

00:06:14.000 --> 00:06:15.000
 So...

00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:19.000
 Your time will not be wasted.

00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:20.000
 Okay?

00:06:20.000 --> 00:06:27.000
 So, why should we be studying ancient texts in the 21st century?

00:06:27.000 --> 00:06:28.000
 Let me give you at least three reasons.

00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:33.000
 First, we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses.

00:06:33.000 --> 00:06:34.000
 What?

00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:38.000
 Surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses.

00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:40.000
 The author of Hebrews says,

00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:43.000
 You and I stand on the shoulder of giants.

00:06:43.000 --> 00:06:46.000
 The author of Hebrews says, look to them.

00:06:46.000 --> 00:06:48.000
 Look at their faith.

00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:51.000
 Look at their perseverance in trials.

00:06:51.000 --> 00:06:53.000
 And now follow in their footsteps.

00:06:53.000 --> 00:06:56.000
 So in many ways, this is what this class will be about.

00:06:56.000 --> 00:06:59.000
 Their story is going to be our story.

00:06:59.000 --> 00:07:04.000
 The gospel flame, although it ebbs and flows throughout each generation,

00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:06.000
 ultimately it is unquenchable.

00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:10.000
 So, creeds are not just old, dry, archaic documents.

00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:15.000
 These are declarations of faith from our spiritual ancestors.

00:07:15.000 --> 00:07:18.000
 And they're not meant to be muttered under your breath,

00:07:18.000 --> 00:07:23.000
 but they're resounding declarations with blasts of trumpets.

00:07:23.000 --> 00:07:25.000
 And we listen carefully to their voice.

00:07:25.000 --> 00:07:28.000
 We will not only learn from their wisdom,

00:07:28.000 --> 00:07:30.000
 they will exhort you and I to faithfulness,

00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:32.000
 to encourage you to stay the course.

00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:37.000
 Second, to learn the creed is to hear the wisdom of another culture.

00:07:37.000 --> 00:07:41.000
 The church is not confined to one country or nation or language.

00:07:41.000 --> 00:07:47.000
 To hear from the creeds affirms the global and historical nature of the church.

00:07:47.000 --> 00:07:51.000
 The Christians all over the world adhere to the creeds,

00:07:51.000 --> 00:07:54.000
 not because we find them to be on par with the authority of Scripture,

00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:55.000
 but because they are true.

00:07:55.000 --> 00:08:04.000
 Didn't Christ promise this global advance of the gospel throughout the world?

00:08:04.000 --> 00:08:07.000
 The gospel go to every tribe, tongue, and nation,

00:08:07.000 --> 00:08:10.000
 and these creeds are a witness to God fulfilling that promise.

00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:15.000
 You know, growing up in any culture, it gives you certain accents,

00:08:15.000 --> 00:08:18.000
 different ways of saying words.

00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:24.000
 For example, we here in New Haven correctly say the word car keys.

00:08:24.000 --> 00:08:25.000
 Correctly.

00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:30.000
 But if you're in Boston, they make the mistake of saying khakis,

00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:31.000
 like these pants.

00:08:31.000 --> 00:08:33.000
 I'm sorry, but that's wrong.

00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:35.000
 That's not how you pronounce car keys.

00:08:35.000 --> 00:08:37.000
 But here's the thing.

00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:40.000
 No one ever hears their own accents.

00:08:40.000 --> 00:08:41.000
 Am I right?

00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:45.000
 Not until we meet an outsider do we begin to have self-awareness

00:08:45.000 --> 00:08:48.000
 with how we're saying certain things.

00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:53.000
 And C.S. Lewis made this point in his introduction to Athanasius' work on the Incarnation.

00:08:53.000 --> 00:08:55.000
 He says, to avoid theological errors,

00:08:55.000 --> 00:09:01.000
 you need to read not only outside your culture, but outside your century.

00:09:01.000 --> 00:09:02.000
 He writes,

00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:06.000
 They will not flatter us in the errors we are already committing.

00:09:06.000 --> 00:09:10.000
 And their own errors being now open and palpable will not endanger us.

00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:12.000
 Two heads are better than one.

00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:14.000
 Not because either is infallible,

00:09:14.000 --> 00:09:17.000
 but because they are unlikely to go wrong in the same direction.

00:09:17.000 --> 00:09:21.000
 So if we all listen to the same 21st century voices,

00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:25.000
 we're going to repeat the same 21st century mistakes.

00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:30.000
 So Christians must learn from prior generations of God's people.

00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:35.000
 And we benefit from their wisdom, their exegetical insights, and their doctrinal clarity.

00:09:35.000 --> 00:09:38.000
 And often this clarity we take for granted.

00:09:38.000 --> 00:09:42.000
 And that clarity can be lost in a generation.

00:09:42.000 --> 00:09:50.000
 Third, creeds not only summarize Orthodox beliefs, but they are doxological.

00:09:50.000 --> 00:09:58.000
 In other words, we are praising God with our brothers and sisters in Christ across the world throughout all ages.

00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:05.000
 We join the chorus of faithful believers across time in confessing our faith to the glory of God.

00:10:05.000 --> 00:10:11.000
 You know, one of the things we'll learn about is that creeds were used before baptism.

00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:14.000
 So I'm going to make up names here.

00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:17.000
 But we join Chloe.

00:10:17.000 --> 00:10:20.000
 Chloe was a prostitute in 3rd century Rome,

00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:25.000
 who heard about the Lord Jesus and the Lord saved her as a temple prostitute.

00:10:25.000 --> 00:10:28.000
 We join her in reciting the creed.

00:10:28.000 --> 00:10:32.000
 Or we join Octavius, a farmer in Corinth in the 3rd century.

00:10:32.000 --> 00:10:37.000
 Octavius had a, his crops failed, and he was facing devastation.

00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:41.000
 But then the Lord saved him, knowing that Christ was a refuge.

00:10:41.000 --> 00:10:44.000
 We join Octavius in reciting the creed.

00:10:44.000 --> 00:10:49.000
 So this good deposit has been passed down for one generation to the next,

00:10:49.000 --> 00:10:54.000
 and we stand with our brothers and sisters throughout all ages when we recite the creed.

00:10:54.000 --> 00:10:55.000
 Okay.

00:10:55.000 --> 00:11:02.000
 That's why the creeds, that's why we're teaching this class now.

00:11:02.000 --> 00:11:07.000
 We want you to stand and know that you are part of something much bigger than yourself.

00:11:07.000 --> 00:11:09.000
 But there's a problem.

00:11:09.000 --> 00:11:15.000
 And the problem is in the last 200 years, I think particularly in American Christianity,

00:11:15.000 --> 00:11:18.000
 a suspicion has grown about the creeds.

00:11:18.000 --> 00:11:20.000
 Mostly on two fronts.

00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:25.000
 On the one hand, there's been an emphasis on doctrinal minimalism.

00:11:25.000 --> 00:11:32.000
 You know, where there's a fear that you're going to create disunity if you affirm the truth.

00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:35.000
 One of the statements that was made was, you know,

00:11:35.000 --> 00:11:38.000
 it's better to believe heresy than to create disunity.

00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:40.000
 So doctrinal minimalism.

00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:44.000
 But on the other hand, there's a fear of doctrinal sectarianism.

00:11:44.000 --> 00:11:48.000
 Where there's a fear that creeds divide Christians.

00:11:48.000 --> 00:11:53.000
 But of course, Christianity is about truth.

00:11:53.000 --> 00:11:56.000
 If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, Jesus would say.

00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:59.000
 And if you know the truth, the truth will set you free.

00:11:59.000 --> 00:12:03.000
 I wonder, has anyone ever been in a church, maybe a church you grew up in,

00:12:03.000 --> 00:12:05.000
 where you heard the phrase,

00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:08.000
 we have no creed but the Bible?

00:12:08.000 --> 00:12:13.000
 Okay, we have one.

00:12:13.000 --> 00:12:14.000
 Okay.

00:12:14.000 --> 00:12:17.000
 Okay, another one.

00:12:17.000 --> 00:12:22.000
 Has anyone ever been in a snake handling service?

00:12:22.000 --> 00:12:27.000
 Totally unrelated, but I just wanted to...

00:12:27.000 --> 00:12:30.000
 We have no creed but the Bible.

00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:32.000
 It sounds pretty spiritual.

00:12:32.000 --> 00:12:34.000
 It also kind of sounds like a creed.

00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:39.000
 But of course, this statement contains a good aspiration.

00:12:39.000 --> 00:12:46.000
 When someone says no creed but the Bible, they're saying the Bible has a unique authority.

00:12:46.000 --> 00:12:51.000
 And there's a fear that something might replace the authority of the Scripture in that person's life.

00:12:51.000 --> 00:12:53.000
 That's a good aspiration.

00:12:53.000 --> 00:12:57.000
 But of course, that statement never works in real life.

00:12:57.000 --> 00:13:00.000
 Because what do we do in the church?

00:13:00.000 --> 00:13:01.000
 Right?

00:13:01.000 --> 00:13:02.000
 There's this.

00:13:02.000 --> 00:13:03.000
 There's public teaching.

00:13:03.000 --> 00:13:09.000
 There's a standard of truth that must regulate the public teaching of the church.

00:13:09.000 --> 00:13:12.000
 In 2 Timothy 1, verse 13, Paul would tell Timothy,

00:13:12.000 --> 00:13:19.000
 follow the pattern of the sound words that you heard from me in the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus.

00:13:19.000 --> 00:13:24.000
 He doesn't say, hey, memorize my letters or memorize the Scripture.

00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:25.000
 We ought to do that.

00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:29.000
 But he's saying, Timothy, follow the pattern.

00:13:29.000 --> 00:13:30.000
 Follow the norm.

00:13:30.000 --> 00:13:31.000
 Follow the model.

00:13:31.000 --> 00:13:35.000
 Follow the rule that I have given you.

00:13:35.000 --> 00:13:39.000
 Make sure you are teaching by the standard I set.

00:13:40.000 --> 00:13:43.000
 You know, that's why we have a statement of faith here at Trinity.

00:13:43.000 --> 00:13:47.000
 You know, imagine if I get up and start teaching and preaching that,

00:13:47.000 --> 00:13:49.000
 you know what we really need to do?

00:13:49.000 --> 00:13:53.000
 Is to trust Elvis Presley and trust the works that he did.

00:13:53.000 --> 00:13:57.000
 And we all need to move to Graceland in Memphis, Tennessee.

00:13:57.000 --> 00:14:04.000
 You should say, you should say, Tyler, that does not follow the standard of teaching in this church.

00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:05.000
 The standard of truth.

00:14:05.000 --> 00:14:07.000
 And then you should fire me as an elder.

00:14:07.000 --> 00:14:09.000
 So that's what you ought to do.

00:14:09.000 --> 00:14:16.000
 So very early on, we see the importance that teaching had in the early church.

00:14:16.000 --> 00:14:20.000
 And so creedal statements begin to function as that standard.

00:14:20.000 --> 00:14:24.000
 Philip Schaaf wrote this in his classic work.

00:14:24.000 --> 00:14:30.000
 Faith, like all strong conviction, has a desire to utter itself before others.

00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:33.000
 And that conviction led to creeds.

00:14:33.000 --> 00:14:35.000
 But there's another problem.

00:14:35.000 --> 00:14:38.000
 And there's a bigger problem.

00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:47.000
 And I think there's a misunderstanding that if the scripture is supreme, does not that exclude human traditions?

00:14:47.000 --> 00:14:51.000
 I mean, we don't want the creeds of human tradition to rival the scriptures.

00:14:51.000 --> 00:14:53.000
 Right?

00:14:53.000 --> 00:14:58.000
 And so in this class today, I want to define sola scriptura.

00:14:58.000 --> 00:15:01.000
 And we're going to walk through this in three steps.

00:15:01.000 --> 00:15:03.000
 The first step is going to be this.

00:15:03.000 --> 00:15:07.000
 The Bible is the only infallible rule.

00:15:07.000 --> 00:15:11.000
 And so when I say rule, what I mean is a standard that governs faith and practice.

00:15:11.000 --> 00:15:14.000
 So the Bible is unique.

00:15:14.000 --> 00:15:17.000
 Second, there are no other infallible rules.

00:15:17.000 --> 00:15:26.000
 And third, there are other legitimate rules, derived rules, but ultimately a subordinate to the scripture.

00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:29.000
 So these are the three steps we're going to walk through.

00:15:29.000 --> 00:15:33.000
 So the first step, the Bible is the only infallible rule.

00:15:33.000 --> 00:15:35.000
 This is the first step in sola scriptura.

00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:40.000
 Scripture, bless you, is the perfect standard of truth.

00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:45.000
 Scripture has an unparalleled authority, period.

00:15:45.000 --> 00:15:46.000
 No rivals.

00:15:46.000 --> 00:15:49.000
 Jesus illustrates this conviction.

00:15:49.000 --> 00:15:52.000
 Jesus asserted against Satan in the wilderness,

00:15:52.000 --> 00:15:57.000
 Man shall live by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.

00:15:57.000 --> 00:16:02.000
 Every single word is a rule for our lives.

00:16:02.000 --> 00:16:07.000
 Jesus had an unshakable confidence in God's words.

00:16:07.000 --> 00:16:08.000
 He loved it.

00:16:08.000 --> 00:16:09.000
 He knew it.

00:16:09.000 --> 00:16:11.000
 He quoted it.

00:16:11.000 --> 00:16:13.000
 The scripture cannot be broken.

00:16:13.000 --> 00:16:16.000
 He would say, God's words are unbreakable.

00:16:16.000 --> 00:16:22.000
 No promise, no warning, no word will be falsified.

00:16:22.000 --> 00:16:25.000
 Down to the last stroke.

00:16:25.000 --> 00:16:38.000
 For truly I tell you, Jesus would say, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter will pass from the law until all is accomplished.

00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:43.000
 You see, he held scripture in the highest possible esteem.

00:16:43.000 --> 00:16:48.000
 The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of God will stand forever.

00:16:48.000 --> 00:16:53.000
 And Jesus treated every single stroke as important.

00:16:53.000 --> 00:16:55.000
 Jesus was comfortable.

00:16:55.000 --> 00:17:00.000
 I think John mentioned this in his former foundation class a few years ago.

00:17:00.000 --> 00:17:02.000
 Eight classes on the doctrine of scripture.

00:17:02.000 --> 00:17:05.000
 So if you want more on this, go listen to that class.

00:17:05.000 --> 00:17:13.000
 Jesus was comfortable having his argument hint on a single word, even a single tense of a word.

00:17:13.000 --> 00:17:21.000
 You remember in response to the Sadducees, Jesus hints his arguments on the tense of a word.

00:17:21.000 --> 00:17:24.000
 Matthew 22, verse 32.

00:17:24.000 --> 00:17:28.000
 He says, God did not say I was the God of Abraham.

00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:32.000
 He says, I am the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

00:17:32.000 --> 00:17:33.000
 Present tense.

00:17:33.000 --> 00:17:36.000
 So he is not the God of the dead, but of the living.

00:17:36.000 --> 00:17:41.000
 Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are still alive because of the verb tense.

00:17:41.000 --> 00:17:47.000
 There is more to it, but you notice his argument hinges on a single tense of a single word.

00:17:47.000 --> 00:17:51.000
 Jesus debated the Pharisees about marriage and divorce.

00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:54.000
 Jesus responds with, have you not read?

00:17:54.000 --> 00:17:56.000
 In his mind, that's settled the debate.

00:17:56.000 --> 00:17:58.000
 Have you not read?

00:17:58.000 --> 00:18:02.000
 Elsewhere, he says, you err because you do not know the scriptures.

00:18:02.000 --> 00:18:04.000
 Of course, we can use other examples.

00:18:04.000 --> 00:18:08.000
 Paul tells the Galatians that not only the apostolic teaching,

00:18:08.000 --> 00:18:12.000
 but even angelic teaching must be tested by the scriptures.

00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:17.000
 Even if we are an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you,

00:18:17.000 --> 00:18:19.000
 let him be accursed.

00:18:19.000 --> 00:18:24.000
 Paul would say whatever is said needs to be brought before the bar of scripture, and it must align.

00:18:24.000 --> 00:18:33.000
 The Barans are commended for their noble spirit and diligently verifying Paul and Silas' teaching to see if it aligns with the scripture.

00:18:33.000 --> 00:18:34.000
 Go on.

00:18:34.000 --> 00:18:35.000
 Warning the church of false teaching.

00:18:35.000 --> 00:18:37.000
 The apostle John writes,

00:18:37.000 --> 00:18:42.000
 Do not believe everyone, but test the spirits.

00:18:42.000 --> 00:18:45.000
 Test what we're saying to you to see if it aligns with the scripture.

00:18:45.000 --> 00:18:55.000
 So that's the heart cry of Sola Scriptura, which says that scripture sits above and judges all human traditions.

00:18:55.000 --> 00:18:58.000
 This is the court of the highest jurisdiction.

00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:02.000
 It is the final court of appeals.

00:19:02.000 --> 00:19:05.000
 And the reformers stood on this principle in the Reformation.

00:19:05.000 --> 00:19:14.000
 And so they had a freedom to take a critical stance toward popes who granted indulgences to fund the basilica.

00:19:14.000 --> 00:19:16.000
 Salvation at discount prices.

00:19:16.000 --> 00:19:22.000
 They were critical toward councils in any human tradition that failed to measure up to the standard of the word of God.

00:19:22.000 --> 00:19:30.000
 But it's not just the function, but the scriptures very nature and character is different.

00:19:30.000 --> 00:19:33.000
 Scripture itself claims to be infallible.

00:19:33.000 --> 00:19:37.000
 God's word is God breathed, Paul writes.

00:19:37.000 --> 00:19:40.000
 He makes up a word, theopneustos.

00:19:40.000 --> 00:19:44.000
 All scripture is theopneustos, breathed out by God.

00:19:44.000 --> 00:19:47.000
 It's expired like God breathes out the scripture.

00:19:47.000 --> 00:19:52.000
 And it's profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness.

00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:56.000
 And the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

00:19:56.000 --> 00:20:00.000
 So God's speech is ontologically unique.

00:20:00.000 --> 00:20:09.000
 Now you see this conviction of the authoritative nature in the earliest disciples.

00:20:09.000 --> 00:20:11.000
 Even after the apostolic era.

00:20:11.000 --> 00:20:15.000
 If you read Ignatius, the bishop of Antioch, a disciple of the apostle John.

00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:18.000
 A generation removed from the apostles.

00:20:18.000 --> 00:20:20.000
 He wrote to the church of Rome,

00:20:20.000 --> 00:20:23.000
 Look, I do not give you orders like Peter and Paul.

00:20:23.000 --> 00:20:24.000
 They were apostles.

00:20:24.000 --> 00:20:29.000
 He's clearly distinguishing his authority to the apostolic authority.

00:20:29.000 --> 00:20:34.000
 When Athanasius is arguing against the Arian heresy in the fourth century, he appeals to what?

00:20:34.000 --> 00:20:36.000
 He's appealing to the scripture.

00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:37.000
 Right?

00:20:37.000 --> 00:20:41.000
 Now you can imagine, what if someone had said to Athanasius,

00:20:41.000 --> 00:20:43.000
 You know, Athanasius, who are you?

00:20:43.000 --> 00:20:48.000
 People have disagreed about whether Jesus is really God for at least 300 years.

00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:51.000
 Who do you think you are citing the scriptures?

00:20:51.000 --> 00:20:54.000
 When most of the world disagrees with you at this point.

00:20:54.000 --> 00:20:55.000
 So stop fighting the battle.

00:20:55.000 --> 00:20:58.000
 Let's stop creating disunity in the body.

00:20:58.000 --> 00:21:02.000
 Whether Jesus is Lord or not, we should stop dividing over this doctrine.

00:21:02.000 --> 00:21:06.000
 Well, thank God Athanasius didn't buy that.

00:21:06.000 --> 00:21:09.000
 He stood firm on the scriptures.

00:21:09.000 --> 00:21:14.000
 So what matters most, step number one, is what the scriptures say.

00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:17.000
 That's the posture of sola scriptura.

00:21:17.000 --> 00:21:20.000
 The scripture is the highest authority.

00:21:20.000 --> 00:21:23.000
 Let me just stop here.

00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:25.000
 Any questions before we go to step two?

00:21:25.000 --> 00:21:28.000
 Okay.

00:21:28.000 --> 00:21:29.000
 Tom?

00:21:29.000 --> 00:21:31.000
 Just a clarification.

00:21:31.000 --> 00:21:36.000
 So sola scriptura, in other words, there is a popular,

00:21:36.000 --> 00:21:40.000
 I think what you're saying is a popular conception of sola scriptura means,

00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:42.000
 we only have the scriptures and nothing else.

00:21:42.000 --> 00:21:46.000
 But you're saying, no, no, it's the only infallible guide.

00:21:46.000 --> 00:21:50.000
 There's lots of other rules and guides that have some authority,

00:21:50.000 --> 00:21:52.000
 but they're just subordinated to that.

00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:57.000
 So we do have all sorts of other methods or practices or whatever,

00:21:57.000 --> 00:22:00.000
 but the scriptures are the beginning and end of that.

00:22:00.000 --> 00:22:01.000
 That's where it starts.

00:22:01.000 --> 00:22:03.000
 Yes, yes.

00:22:03.000 --> 00:22:07.000
 You're anticipating my point number three, but that's exactly what you said.

00:22:07.000 --> 00:22:10.000
 It's exactly, I couldn't have said it better myself.

00:22:10.000 --> 00:22:11.000
 Yes.

00:22:11.000 --> 00:22:12.000
 Thank you, Tom.

00:22:12.000 --> 00:22:13.000
 I appreciate that.

00:22:13.000 --> 00:22:14.000
 Richard.

00:22:14.000 --> 00:22:21.000
 So I noticed that in your definition you stopped short of saying rule of faith.

00:22:21.000 --> 00:22:23.000
 You stopped with rule.

00:22:23.000 --> 00:22:25.000
 Is that significant?

00:22:25.000 --> 00:22:28.000
 Whatever scripture it speaks on, it's a rule.

00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:37.000
 I didn't mean to say that scripture has a jurisdiction that I'm imposing upon it.

00:22:37.000 --> 00:22:45.000
 I'm not sure if that's what you mean, but I think the scripture is an infallible rule for matters of faith,

00:22:45.000 --> 00:22:46.000
 but practice as well.

00:22:46.000 --> 00:22:51.000
 As Paul said in 2 Timothy, equipped for every good work.

00:22:51.000 --> 00:22:54.000
 So that scripture is equipping us for every good work.

00:22:54.000 --> 00:23:02.000
 So that's point number one is an infallible rule, but there's a second point.

00:23:02.000 --> 00:23:08.000
 Does the church possess other rules, other sources of revelation, other authorities,

00:23:08.000 --> 00:23:12.000
 maybe like the apostles of Nicene Creed, that are infallible?

00:23:12.000 --> 00:23:14.000
 And the answer is no.

00:23:14.000 --> 00:23:16.000
 There is no other infallible rule.

00:23:16.000 --> 00:23:20.000
 And we should never give human teaching the kind of authority,

00:23:20.000 --> 00:23:27.000
 or we should never venerate human teaching that belongs to God's word alone.

00:23:27.000 --> 00:23:30.000
 Jesus, remember, dealt with this with the Pharisees.

00:23:30.000 --> 00:23:37.000
 The Pharisees criticized Jesus for not following their fastidious traditions.

00:23:37.000 --> 00:23:41.000
 Not only the hand washing, but remember Corbin,

00:23:41.000 --> 00:23:47.000
 where you give money to a fund so I don't have enough money to honor my father and mother any longer.

00:23:47.000 --> 00:23:49.000
 And Jesus rightly rebuked them.

00:23:49.000 --> 00:23:51.000
 He said, he quoted Isaiah,

00:23:51.000 --> 00:24:06.000
 Here's the important part.

00:24:06.000 --> 00:24:09.000
 The doctrines, the commandments of men.

00:24:09.000 --> 00:24:14.000
 Paul instructs the church in 1 Corinthians 4,

00:24:14.000 --> 00:24:17.000
 You may learn from us the meaning of the saying,

00:24:17.000 --> 00:24:21.000
 You may not go beyond what is written.

00:24:21.000 --> 00:24:24.000
 So there's a dark side of tradition too.

00:24:24.000 --> 00:24:26.000
 We might call this traditionalism.

00:24:26.000 --> 00:24:30.000
 Rather than saying scripture alone has the final word,

00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:33.000
 human traditions are now adding to it.

00:24:33.000 --> 00:24:41.000
 Of course, how we view the creeds is how we're going to differ from, say, Roman Catholicism or East Orthodox.

00:24:41.000 --> 00:24:48.000
 Roman Catholicism would say, you know, church tradition is another source of infallible revelation.

00:24:48.000 --> 00:25:01.000
 For example, the claim of papal infallibility, which says, if the Pope speaks ex cathedra from the chair in matters of faith and practice, the Pope claims to be infallible.

00:25:01.000 --> 00:25:04.000
 The tradition is now on the same level as scripture.

00:25:04.000 --> 00:25:07.000
 You must accept that as final and binding.

00:25:07.000 --> 00:25:10.000
 Of course, we do this too.

00:25:10.000 --> 00:25:21.000
 We sit ex cathedra and begin to make up our own rules and our personal convictions, and we begin to enforce those on others and bind their consciences.

00:25:21.000 --> 00:25:27.000
 We make our own rules about schooling and music and which candidates to vote for.

00:25:27.000 --> 00:25:32.000
 Of course, there's matters of wisdom in this, but the scripture gives no clear command.

00:25:32.000 --> 00:25:37.000
 And it gives us freedom of conscience on these matters.

00:25:37.000 --> 00:25:43.000
 So, the human tradition and scripture are not on the same level.

00:25:43.000 --> 00:25:53.000
 But I want you to notice that it wasn't that the Pharisees or the church didn't have real authority.

00:25:53.000 --> 00:25:57.000
 Real authority to teach, to apply the law, and to make judgments.

00:25:57.000 --> 00:26:04.000
 In Matthew 23, Jesus said the teachers of the law and the Pharisees sat on the seat of Moses.

00:26:04.000 --> 00:26:07.000
 And so, you must be careful to do everything they tell you.

00:26:07.000 --> 00:26:09.000
 That's what Jesus said.

00:26:09.000 --> 00:26:12.000
 The Pharisees held real authority, and you should listen to them.

00:26:12.000 --> 00:26:14.000
 So, how does that work?

00:26:14.000 --> 00:26:20.000
 I mean, Jesus clearly saying, don't listen to their doctrines, the commandments of men, right?

00:26:20.000 --> 00:26:23.000
 But then he says, no, but you actually have to listen to them.

00:26:23.000 --> 00:26:26.000
 How do these two things work?

00:26:26.000 --> 00:26:33.000
 I think we need to distinguish the kinds of authority Jesus is giving the Pharisees.

00:26:33.000 --> 00:26:38.000
 What Jesus is referring to in that case is what we call ministerial authority.

00:26:38.000 --> 00:26:42.000
 It's an authority to apply the word.

00:26:42.000 --> 00:26:47.000
 One analogy you can think about this is the Constitution.

00:26:47.000 --> 00:26:48.000
 Right?

00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:55.000
 We have, theoretically, we have courts that settle disputes, and the courts don't make up the Constitution.

00:26:55.000 --> 00:26:59.000
 They are applying it, theoretically.

00:26:59.000 --> 00:27:01.000
 So, are their courts infallible?

00:27:01.000 --> 00:27:02.000
 Of course not.

00:27:02.000 --> 00:27:03.000
 No, they're not.

00:27:03.000 --> 00:27:05.000
 Or think about baseball.

00:27:05.000 --> 00:27:06.000
 You have umpires.

00:27:06.000 --> 00:27:08.000
 They call balls and strikes.

00:27:08.000 --> 00:27:10.000
 Does an umpire have authority?

00:27:10.000 --> 00:27:12.000
 Yes, they do.

00:27:12.000 --> 00:27:14.000
 Is the umpire infallible?

00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:15.000
 Of course not.

00:27:15.000 --> 00:27:16.000
 Of course not.

00:27:16.000 --> 00:27:21.000
 Ministerial authority is real authority, but it is not an infallible one.

00:27:21.000 --> 00:27:24.000
 Think about a congregational meeting.

00:27:24.000 --> 00:27:25.000
 Okay?

00:27:25.000 --> 00:27:29.000
 We are going to collectively discern Pamela's candidacy.

00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:38.000
 And we are going to make decisions together about matters of faith and practice.

00:27:38.000 --> 00:27:43.000
 Now, are our decisions infallible as a congregation together?

00:27:43.000 --> 00:27:44.000
 No.

00:27:44.000 --> 00:27:45.000
 They're not.

00:27:45.000 --> 00:27:46.000
 Right?

00:27:46.000 --> 00:27:55.000
 Our decisions are useful only to the extent they reproduce and apply faithfully the teaching of Scripture itself.

00:27:55.000 --> 00:27:57.000
 And so, I want you to think about that.

00:27:57.000 --> 00:27:59.000
 It's the same with creeds.

00:27:59.000 --> 00:28:02.000
 We shouldn't follow the creeds just because they're a tradition.

00:28:02.000 --> 00:28:04.000
 They were written a long time ago.

00:28:04.000 --> 00:28:05.000
 Right?

00:28:05.000 --> 00:28:11.000
 Where Catholics would say, we follow the Nicene Creed because it was said at the Council of Nicaea,

00:28:11.000 --> 00:28:13.000
 so therefore it's binding.

00:28:13.000 --> 00:28:19.000
 I think the position that we ought to take is, we follow the Nicene Creed because it aligns with the Scripture.

00:28:19.000 --> 00:28:21.000
 And that's very important.

00:28:21.000 --> 00:28:25.000
 Every tradition must be grounded in God's Word.

00:28:25.000 --> 00:28:28.000
 And Scripture is the highest court of authority.

00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:29.000
 Okay.

00:28:29.000 --> 00:28:35.000
 But now there's a big problem with what I've just described to you.

00:28:35.000 --> 00:28:46.000
 And one of the common objections that comes out of this framework of sola scriptura is, say, for Mormon Catholics.

00:28:46.000 --> 00:28:55.000
 They say, look, without the authoritative interpretation of Rome, aren't we just all left with our own personal readings of Scripture?

00:28:55.000 --> 00:29:06.000
 So the argument goes, you might talk a big game about the Bible being your ultimate authority, but actually the final authority rests with you, doesn't it?

00:29:06.000 --> 00:29:08.000
 And your individual interpretation of Scripture.

00:29:08.000 --> 00:29:17.000
 The creeds don't really have a real authority because you can simply disagree with them on your private interpretation.

00:29:17.000 --> 00:29:20.000
 And what you get is a free-for-all.

00:29:20.000 --> 00:29:24.000
 And this flaw exists in many so-called churches.

00:29:24.000 --> 00:29:29.000
 Benny Hinn, prosperity preacher and false teacher, says, Trinity?

00:29:29.000 --> 00:29:30.000
 There's nine of them.

00:29:30.000 --> 00:29:33.000
 The very next words is you can't argue with the Word, can you?

00:29:33.000 --> 00:29:34.000
 It's right.

00:29:34.000 --> 00:29:35.000
 It's all in the Word right there.

00:29:35.000 --> 00:29:37.000
 It's like in the Book of Judges.

00:29:37.000 --> 00:29:43.000
 Each person defines Christianity as it seems right in his or her eyes.

00:29:43.000 --> 00:29:54.000
 The Scriptures are twisted because we go to the corner with our Bible and we come up with a novel interpretation that no one's ever heard of before.

00:29:54.000 --> 00:30:01.000
 So this is where we need the final three-legged stool of Sola Scriptura.

00:30:01.000 --> 00:30:09.000
 And this final point is often neglected and I think it would be helpful for us to consider it together.

00:30:09.000 --> 00:30:12.000
 The first step is there's an infallible rule for the church.

00:30:12.000 --> 00:30:15.000
 The second is there are no other infallible rules.

00:30:15.000 --> 00:30:20.000
 But lastly, there are other authorities within the church.

00:30:20.000 --> 00:30:25.000
 But these authorities are derived and based on the Scripture.

00:30:26.000 --> 00:30:32.000
 So the term that's sometimes used is the Norma Normans.

00:30:34.000 --> 00:30:36.000
 I'll put that on here.

00:30:36.000 --> 00:30:39.000
 The Norma Normans.

00:30:39.000 --> 00:30:41.000
 And that's the Scripture.

00:30:41.000 --> 00:30:50.000
 Any Latin teachers here want to say what that means?

00:30:50.000 --> 00:30:53.000
 The ruling rule.

00:30:53.000 --> 00:30:54.000
 Yes.

00:30:54.000 --> 00:30:56.000
 The terming determinant.

00:30:56.000 --> 00:30:58.000
 The rule that rules.

00:30:58.000 --> 00:31:00.000
 The ruling rule.

00:31:00.000 --> 00:31:02.000
 The determining determinant.

00:31:02.000 --> 00:31:03.000
 That's the Scripture.

00:31:03.000 --> 00:31:05.000
 Okay.

00:31:05.000 --> 00:31:10.000
 And then we have underneath the Norma Normata.

00:31:10.000 --> 00:31:14.000
 Sorry, you can't really see that because...

00:31:14.000 --> 00:31:16.000
 It's invisible.

00:31:16.000 --> 00:31:18.000
 The Norma Normata.

00:31:18.000 --> 00:31:20.000
 It's even harder to read.

00:31:20.000 --> 00:31:23.000
 I did that intentionally.

00:31:23.000 --> 00:31:27.000
 The Norma Normata.

00:31:27.000 --> 00:31:28.000
 Any...

00:31:28.000 --> 00:31:29.000
 Do you want to take...

00:31:29.000 --> 00:31:30.000
 The rule rule.

00:31:30.000 --> 00:31:31.000
 The rule rule.

00:31:31.000 --> 00:31:32.000
 Yes.

00:31:32.000 --> 00:31:35.000
 A rule that is ruled.

00:31:35.000 --> 00:31:36.000
 Right.

00:31:36.000 --> 00:31:39.000
 So that's typically how this works.

00:31:39.000 --> 00:31:41.000
 The Scripture is the Norma Normans.

00:31:42.000 --> 00:31:48.000
 And the creeds are the Norma Norma Normata.

00:31:48.000 --> 00:31:49.000
 Okay.

00:31:49.000 --> 00:31:50.000
 Okay.

00:31:50.000 --> 00:31:51.000
 So often the...

00:31:51.000 --> 00:31:57.000
 Solo Scripture is often misrepresented that the Bible is the only authority in the church.

00:31:57.000 --> 00:31:58.000
 That's not so.

00:31:58.000 --> 00:32:04.000
 It is not solo Scripture which says it's Scripture alone and me alone in a corner somewhere.

00:32:04.000 --> 00:32:05.000
 No.

00:32:05.000 --> 00:32:08.000
 Creeds are an authority in the church.

00:32:08.000 --> 00:32:09.000
 Why?

00:32:09.000 --> 00:32:10.000
 Why can...

00:32:10.000 --> 00:32:11.000
 How can we say that?

00:32:11.000 --> 00:32:18.000
 Because we recognize that the Holy Spirit has been worked in the church for the last 2,000 years.

00:32:18.000 --> 00:32:20.000
 So it's not a zero-sum game.

00:32:20.000 --> 00:32:21.000
 Right?

00:32:21.000 --> 00:32:24.000
 The creeds do not have an independent authority.

00:32:24.000 --> 00:32:27.000
 They are subordinate to the Scriptures.

00:32:28.000 --> 00:32:30.000
 Charles Spurgeon once said,

00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:37.000
 I find it odd that those who think so highly of what the Holy Spirit teaches them think so little of what the Holy Spirit teaches others also.

00:32:37.000 --> 00:32:38.000
 That's...

00:32:38.000 --> 00:32:43.000
 Yeah.

00:32:43.000 --> 00:32:48.000
 It's almost the 21st century.

00:32:48.000 --> 00:32:50.000
 But the Scripture...

00:32:50.000 --> 00:32:53.000
 We don't just approach Scripture in a vacuum.

00:32:53.000 --> 00:32:54.000
 Right?

00:32:54.000 --> 00:32:58.000
 The Scripture must be interpreted in community.

00:32:58.000 --> 00:33:02.000
 And this community includes the communion of saints in all ages.

00:33:02.000 --> 00:33:14.000
 So creeds then will act as a communal balance that acts as a check against our potentially mistaken interpretation.

00:33:14.000 --> 00:33:17.000
 So we learn and rely on others.

00:33:17.000 --> 00:33:23.000
 And we learn from those who have gone before us, who have wrestled with the Scripture.

00:33:23.000 --> 00:33:24.000
 Okay?

00:33:24.000 --> 00:33:28.000
 We do not interpret a part...

00:33:28.000 --> 00:33:34.000
 We do not interpret Scripture apart from creeds, the confessions, or the history and traditions of the church.

00:33:36.000 --> 00:33:42.000
 And we put the burden of proof on those who would seek to overturn the consensus of the church.

00:33:43.000 --> 00:33:44.000
 Right?

00:33:44.000 --> 00:33:48.000
 To do otherwise, think about it, is interpretive chaos.

00:33:48.000 --> 00:33:54.000
 If we go to the Bible and just think, look, I am not influenced by my own culture.

00:33:54.000 --> 00:33:57.000
 I am going to go to the Bible with a blank slate.

00:33:57.000 --> 00:34:06.000
 And we have the posture, I have nothing to learn from Augustine or Athanasius or Aquinas and so many others.

00:34:06.000 --> 00:34:11.000
 It is to ignore that the Holy Spirit has been at work in the church for 2,000 years.

00:34:11.000 --> 00:34:16.000
 And we miss so much when we just take a me and my Bible approach.

00:34:16.000 --> 00:34:20.000
 Not because these men or women are right in everything, they are not infallible.

00:34:20.000 --> 00:34:24.000
 But we apprentice ourselves to a more mature believer.

00:34:25.000 --> 00:34:27.000
 So here is a secret.

00:34:28.000 --> 00:34:31.000
 When competent pastors are preparing a sermon,

00:34:31.000 --> 00:34:37.000
 typically they do not just stare at a page for eight hours at a time and hope for the Spirit's illumination.

00:34:37.000 --> 00:34:42.000
 What they do, and this might be a surprise, they pull commentaries.

00:34:42.000 --> 00:34:45.000
 Maybe a systematic theology off the shelves.

00:34:45.000 --> 00:34:49.000
 Maybe someone they respect and trust has written about the text.

00:34:49.000 --> 00:34:53.000
 They talk to others about what they are seeing in the text.

00:34:53.000 --> 00:34:59.000
 And they use that as aids in their study of the Scripture.

00:34:59.000 --> 00:35:00.000
 Right?

00:35:00.000 --> 00:35:01.000
 All while in prayer.

00:35:01.000 --> 00:35:08.000
 So the pastor is using church tradition as they look at a text.

00:35:08.000 --> 00:35:10.000
 But he is using it responsibly.

00:35:10.000 --> 00:35:11.000
 That is what we ought to be doing.

00:35:11.000 --> 00:35:14.000
 We interpret it together as a community.

00:35:17.000 --> 00:35:21.000
 You know, there were reformers who wrote most about Sola Scriptura.

00:35:22.000 --> 00:35:24.000
 Had a high honor for the creeds.

00:35:24.000 --> 00:35:28.000
 We were reading this the other day in our church history group.

00:35:28.000 --> 00:35:31.000
 And the first line in the Augsburg Confession,

00:35:31.000 --> 00:35:38.000
 one of the first documents that really articulated the faith of the reformers.

00:35:39.000 --> 00:35:41.000
 The first line, they wrote this,

00:35:41.000 --> 00:35:59.000
 Our churches, with common consent, do teach that the decree of the Council of Nicaea concerning the unity of the divine essence and concerning the three persons is true and to be believed without any doubting.

00:35:59.000 --> 00:36:11.000
 So the reformers taught that the Council of Nicaea was a norma normata in their churches.

00:36:11.000 --> 00:36:18.000
 So when we look at the norma normatas in this class, take for example the definition of Chalcedon.

00:36:18.000 --> 00:36:33.000
 We're going to see that church fathers were appealing to Scripture, but what was important is how do we use language that faithfully reproduces what's in the Scripture?

00:36:33.000 --> 00:36:39.000
 There was all these questions in the air about the nature of Christ's humanity and divinity.

00:36:39.000 --> 00:36:47.000
 And if you really look at the definition of Chalcedon, it's really just breaking down what the author of Hebrews says.

00:36:47.000 --> 00:36:54.000
 So maybe a helpful exercise, if you want to do this, is look at Chalcedon and open up the book of Hebrews.

00:36:54.000 --> 00:37:02.000
 And just start marking off where the author of Hebrews says that Christ is divine and his humanity.

00:37:02.000 --> 00:37:07.000
 And then look and cross-reference the definition of Chalcedon and see how those two things overlap.

00:37:07.000 --> 00:37:24.000
 Really, that Council is just taking what we see in the text and they're analyzing it, they're explaining it, they're giving you conceptual frameworks of what's right there in front of your eyes in the Scriptures.

00:37:24.000 --> 00:37:28.000
 Again, it's a hearing aid to help us hear the text better.

00:37:28.000 --> 00:37:35.000
 Another analogy might be when you're in grammar school and you're learning to break down a sentence.

00:37:35.000 --> 00:37:40.000
 Right? You have the subject, you have the object, the direct object, the indirect object.

00:37:40.000 --> 00:37:44.000
 Right? When you're breaking down a sentence, you're not adding anything to the sentence.

00:37:44.000 --> 00:37:52.000
 You're just putting categories to help you conceptually understand what is being said in the sentence.

00:37:52.000 --> 00:37:54.000
 And that's what the creeds are doing for us.

00:37:54.000 --> 00:38:01.000
 They're giving us categories to help us analyze the text of Scripture.

00:38:01.000 --> 00:38:03.000
 It's a norma normata.

00:38:03.000 --> 00:38:09.000
 Let me pause there. Any questions? Any thoughts, comments, clarifications?

00:38:09.000 --> 00:38:30.000
 It seems like I was reading in the late that a lot of these creeds were born out of conflict in the 2nd and 3rd century when Christ and the Spirit and all these doctrines were hashed out.

00:38:30.000 --> 00:38:40.000
 The creeds aren't born, they're not intellectualistic. They're not born in a scholarly study.

00:38:40.000 --> 00:38:53.000
 Like, let me write a creed. It's always because there's somebody from within or from without threatening the true teaching of Scripture.

00:38:53.000 --> 00:39:03.000
 That oftentimes the creeds are giving clarity to something, again, that we take for granted. That's so true.

00:39:03.000 --> 00:39:08.000
 I mean, the word Trinity is church tradition. Like, the word Trinity is not found in the Bible.

00:39:08.000 --> 00:39:11.000
 But we understand that's faithfully reproducing what's in the text.

00:39:11.000 --> 00:39:13.000
 Or the term Great Commission.

00:39:13.000 --> 00:39:19.000
 That term is not found in the Scripture, but it's referring to Matthew 28 and the church's commission as we go forward to make disciples.

00:39:19.000 --> 00:39:30.000
 Yeah, so these traditions are born out of believers wanting to state clearly what their beliefs are.

00:39:31.000 --> 00:39:34.000
 That Jesus is Lord. It's that important.

00:39:34.000 --> 00:39:35.000
 That's...

00:39:35.000 --> 00:39:35.000


00:39:35.000 --> 00:39:40.000
 Yeah, I...

00:39:40.000 --> 00:39:43.000
 Anything else? Any other questions, comments?

00:39:43.000 --> 00:39:49.000
 Well, you know, I think one of the...

00:39:49.000 --> 00:40:03.000
 One of the episodes in history that really drove home the importance of this for me was when I was reading the debates between Athanasius, his camp, and the Arians in their camp.

00:40:03.000 --> 00:40:07.000
 So, Arianism.

00:40:07.000 --> 00:40:15.000
 Arius was a tall, handsome, wealthy, winsome poet, songwriter.

00:40:15.000 --> 00:40:18.000
 All you could want in a pastor, right?

00:40:18.000 --> 00:40:23.000
 Except he denied that Jesus was Lord. There was that part, too.

00:40:23.000 --> 00:40:27.000
 And so, and Arians gained political power.

00:40:27.000 --> 00:40:33.000
 So, after the rise of...

00:40:33.000 --> 00:40:35.000
 And the rise of Constantine.

00:40:35.000 --> 00:40:41.000
 And the Arians were persecuting those who confessed that Jesus was Lord.

00:40:41.000 --> 00:40:47.000
 Athanasius was exiled six times, or maybe more than that, for confessing that Jesus was Lord.

00:40:47.000 --> 00:40:50.000
 And he was called by his enemies the Black Dwarf.

00:40:50.000 --> 00:40:55.000
 And one of the... one of the... my heroes in church history.

00:40:55.000 --> 00:41:01.000
 But when they came together, both sides confessed to believing the Bible.

00:41:01.000 --> 00:41:08.000
 And Orthodox believers would cite a Bible verse to prove that Jesus was Lord.

00:41:08.000 --> 00:41:13.000
 But to their surprise, they were met with perfect agreement on the other side.

00:41:13.000 --> 00:41:23.000
 So the other... the other... the Arians, they denied Jesus was Lord, but they could safely accept the phrases that were being used.

00:41:23.000 --> 00:41:27.000
 Because they used it as an open canister where they can just fill in their own meanings.

00:41:27.000 --> 00:41:30.000
 Sort of like a post-modern evasion of language.

00:41:30.000 --> 00:41:31.000
 All right?

00:41:31.000 --> 00:41:36.000
 So the... Athanasius in his camp would say, Christ is the Son of God.

00:41:36.000 --> 00:41:41.000
 A term to convey the Son's divinity and his special relationship with the Father.

00:41:41.000 --> 00:41:44.000
 He has all the divine prerogatives.

00:41:44.000 --> 00:41:48.000
 The Arians would say, okay, but like all sons, he must have had a beginning.

00:41:48.000 --> 00:41:54.000
 And Richard Hansen explained the process like this at the Council of Nicaea.

00:41:54.000 --> 00:42:04.000
 Theologians of the Christian Church were slowly driven to a realization that the deepest questions which faced Christianity cannot be answered in purely biblical language.

00:42:04.000 --> 00:42:06.000
 It may be surprising. Why?

00:42:06.000 --> 00:42:11.000
 Because the questions are about the meaning of the biblical language itself.

00:42:11.000 --> 00:42:13.000
 Right?

00:42:13.000 --> 00:42:14.000
 So...

00:42:14.000 --> 00:42:19.000
 The Arians wanted to take the high ground and say, no creed but the Bible.

00:42:19.000 --> 00:42:22.000
 Let's just stick with biblical language.

00:42:22.000 --> 00:42:31.000
 A thing where Athanasius in his camp wanted to say, no, but we need to clarify what's in the language itself.

00:42:31.000 --> 00:42:32.000
 Right?

00:42:32.000 --> 00:42:36.000
 We need to clarify that Jesus was Lord.

00:42:36.000 --> 00:42:47.000
 And so they came up with a non-biblical term which we'll talk about which said that Jesus was of the same substance as the Father.

00:42:47.000 --> 00:42:51.039
 and that was enough to divide the two camps

00:42:51.039 --> 00:42:54.139
 you can't either agree with that or you don't agree with that

00:42:54.139 --> 00:42:57.500
 is he similar or is he of the same substance as the father

00:42:57.500 --> 00:43:01.699
 and eternity is a difference in those two

00:43:01.699 --> 00:43:03.400
 terms

00:43:03.400 --> 00:43:08.360
 so that's why we need the norma normata

00:43:08.360 --> 00:43:12.940
 again because we're trying to clarify what's in the scripture itself

00:43:12.940 --> 00:43:14.880
 Richard you have a point you want to make

00:43:14.880 --> 00:43:20.260
 yes so the principle that the bible interprets itself

00:43:20.260 --> 00:43:23.260
 fails at this point

00:43:23.260 --> 00:43:27.760
 I don't think so but go ahead say what say more

00:43:27.760 --> 00:43:33.200
 well the language of the bible is insufficient

00:43:33.200 --> 00:43:36.000
 to for understanding the bible

00:43:36.000 --> 00:43:39.760
 oh I see what you're saying so there's

00:43:39.760 --> 00:43:42.760
 so there there's

00:43:42.760 --> 00:43:45.300
 we have to distinguish the

00:43:45.300 --> 00:43:49.140
 doctrinal clarity

00:43:49.140 --> 00:43:51.100
 if we never have the norma normata

00:43:51.100 --> 00:43:54.640
 you can go to the scriptures and find that Jesus is Lord

00:43:54.640 --> 00:43:59.080
 the things that are most important to salvation are clear

00:43:59.079 --> 00:44:16.460
 they're understandable and that is we don't need the norma normata to have a correct understanding of scripture but again it's a hearing aid to help us hear what's already in the text sometimes it amplifies certain truths that are in the scripture so I don't I won't say it's insufficient but it is a tool just like church tradition is a tool to help us interpret the scripture we're relying upon our

00:44:16.460 --> 00:44:18.000
 certain truths that are in the scripture.

00:44:19.159 --> 00:44:21.139
 So I wouldn't say it's insufficient,

00:44:21.500 --> 00:44:23.079
 but it is a tool,

00:44:23.460 --> 00:44:25.960
 just like church tradition is a tool

00:44:25.960 --> 00:44:27.539
 to help us interpret the scripture.

00:44:27.940 --> 00:44:29.480
 We're relying upon those

00:44:29.480 --> 00:44:31.119
 who have the Holy Spirit before us

00:44:31.119 --> 00:44:32.980
 to give us insight and clarity.

00:44:33.840 --> 00:44:36.440
 But I think if I give the Bible

00:44:36.440 --> 00:44:38.139
 to a farmer who's never heard

00:44:38.139 --> 00:44:39.099
 of the Council of Nicaea,

00:44:39.500 --> 00:44:40.579
 and I just said, you know,

00:44:40.579 --> 00:44:42.119
 read the Gospel of John.

00:44:42.880 --> 00:44:45.000
 And I think that person would say,

00:44:45.000 --> 00:44:47.440
 you know, Jesus claims to be God himself.

00:44:47.579 --> 00:44:48.699
 The Word was with God.

00:44:48.760 --> 00:44:49.579
 The Word was God.

00:44:52.079 --> 00:44:55.300
 But again, there are certain doctrinal clarity

00:44:55.300 --> 00:44:58.000
 that's helpful for us as a church

00:44:58.000 --> 00:45:01.300
 when there's controversy

00:45:01.300 --> 00:45:03.199
 about some of the meanings of this language.

00:45:03.360 --> 00:45:04.380
 I don't know if that answers your question,

00:45:04.559 --> 00:45:05.400
 but maybe not.

00:45:05.420 --> 00:45:06.179
 Can I follow it up?

00:45:06.280 --> 00:45:06.739
 Yeah, go ahead.

00:45:06.739 --> 00:45:12.980
 So the initial creed, Jesus is Lord, right?

00:45:13.179 --> 00:45:13.360
 Yeah.

00:45:13.360 --> 00:45:16.220
 So the two terms in that simple sentence,

00:45:16.360 --> 00:45:17.340
 Jesus and Lord,

00:45:17.820 --> 00:45:20.200
 are found many, many times in the scriptures.

00:45:20.440 --> 00:45:20.740
 Yes.

00:45:21.059 --> 00:45:23.039
 Surely then we can use,

00:45:23.220 --> 00:45:25.200
 a careful study of the scriptures

00:45:25.200 --> 00:45:29.300
 will result in informing those two terms

00:45:29.300 --> 00:45:31.420
 properly and biblically.

00:45:31.900 --> 00:45:32.099
 Yeah.

00:45:32.099 --> 00:45:34.599
 If others, Christian or not,

00:45:34.720 --> 00:45:36.760
 inform those terms otherwise,

00:45:37.680 --> 00:45:39.539
 they are being unfaithful to the scripture.

00:45:39.539 --> 00:45:43.039
 We need, in this case,

00:45:43.199 --> 00:45:44.820
 we need nothing beyond the scripture

00:45:44.820 --> 00:45:46.860
 to come to the right conclusion.

00:45:48.000 --> 00:45:50.079
 I understand your point.

00:45:50.179 --> 00:45:50.360
 Yes.

00:45:50.440 --> 00:45:53.139
 So the, yes, Jesus is Lord.

00:45:53.639 --> 00:45:54.900
 The scriptures are sufficient.

00:45:55.059 --> 00:45:55.920
 Remember, Paul says,

00:45:56.059 --> 00:45:57.739
 for every good work.

00:45:57.739 --> 00:45:58.739
 So we don't,

00:45:58.959 --> 00:46:00.159
 the scriptures are,

00:46:00.239 --> 00:46:02.539
 are there and the nature

00:46:02.539 --> 00:46:03.479
 and character of the scriptures

00:46:03.479 --> 00:46:05.819
 allows us so that we can approach them

00:46:05.819 --> 00:46:06.719
 and,

00:46:06.719 --> 00:46:09.139
 and glean the things that are the most obvious,

00:46:09.139 --> 00:46:11.259
 which are the things that are pertaining to salvation.

00:46:11.879 --> 00:46:13.039
 Jesus is Lord.

00:46:13.639 --> 00:46:14.059
 They're,

00:46:14.059 --> 00:46:16.480
 that's certainly there.

00:46:16.579 --> 00:46:17.480
 I think one of the,

00:46:17.860 --> 00:46:19.320
 and we'll talk about this next class,

00:46:19.900 --> 00:46:22.960
 is the creeds were an authority

00:46:22.960 --> 00:46:24.840
 before the canonization of the scripture.

00:46:25.820 --> 00:46:27.619
 So before we had the,

00:46:27.619 --> 00:46:28.519
 the biblical canon,

00:46:28.920 --> 00:46:31.039
 there were certain rules of faith

00:46:31.039 --> 00:46:32.799
 that the early church would use

00:46:32.799 --> 00:46:33.279
 that were,

00:46:33.360 --> 00:46:35.779
 that were centered around the gospel.

00:46:36.139 --> 00:46:37.099
 And those,

00:46:37.279 --> 00:46:39.679
 those things were passed down as traditions

00:46:39.679 --> 00:46:42.099
 in the early church apostolic era.

00:46:42.099 --> 00:46:45.480
 But those rules of faith

00:46:45.480 --> 00:46:47.279
 were never meant to be an independent authority.

00:46:47.880 --> 00:46:49.900
 They were always subserving to the scriptures.

00:46:51.500 --> 00:46:51.860
 So, I mean,

00:46:52.000 --> 00:46:54.360
 the first Corinthians literally says,

00:46:54.460 --> 00:46:55.139
 obey tradition.

00:46:56.179 --> 00:46:58.920
 But those traditions were,

00:46:59.239 --> 00:47:01.259
 are now for us in the canon.

00:47:02.139 --> 00:47:05.000
 The apostolic deposit is now written down

00:47:05.000 --> 00:47:05.639
 in the canon.

00:47:05.860 --> 00:47:07.059
 So, yeah.

00:47:07.380 --> 00:47:08.019
 Yeah, I mean,

00:47:08.039 --> 00:47:10.759
 I guess what I would think is to say that

00:47:10.760 --> 00:47:13.700
 I think there's two different things going on here, right?

00:47:13.780 --> 00:47:14.600
 Because if you say,

00:47:14.760 --> 00:47:15.880
 scripture interprets scripture,

00:47:16.480 --> 00:47:18.500
 I think the principle there is that

00:47:18.500 --> 00:47:19.980
 if there's a question about

00:47:19.980 --> 00:47:21.660
 an ambiguous nature of the text,

00:47:21.740 --> 00:47:24.060
 we look to see if there's other parts of scripture

00:47:24.060 --> 00:47:26.340
 that are more clear about what the text is talking about.

00:47:26.340 --> 00:47:27.039
 Yeah.

00:47:27.300 --> 00:47:29.079
 And then I think the other element

00:47:29.079 --> 00:47:29.840
 is that

00:47:29.840 --> 00:47:32.500
 if we do like a systematic theology,

00:47:32.960 --> 00:47:33.220
 right,

00:47:33.280 --> 00:47:34.539
 where we take a certain term

00:47:34.539 --> 00:47:35.500
 or a certain concept

00:47:35.500 --> 00:47:36.700
 and look at the entire scripture

00:47:36.700 --> 00:47:37.860
 or what it says about that,

00:47:38.160 --> 00:47:39.420
 that is a good way of

00:47:39.420 --> 00:47:41.280
 getting a hold of

00:47:41.280 --> 00:47:42.360
 the idea.

00:47:43.019 --> 00:47:43.420
 However,

00:47:43.539 --> 00:47:44.240
 even then,

00:47:44.640 --> 00:47:46.480
 to what I think Tyler is pointing out,

00:47:46.980 --> 00:47:47.600
 is that

00:47:47.600 --> 00:47:50.579
 the words that we use in scripture

00:47:50.579 --> 00:47:51.559
 are

00:47:51.559 --> 00:47:53.340
 underdetermined.

00:47:53.340 --> 00:47:54.140
 underdetermined,

00:47:54.200 --> 00:47:54.840
 meaning like

00:47:54.840 --> 00:47:56.460
 no word

00:47:56.460 --> 00:47:58.460
 that we find in scripture,

00:47:58.600 --> 00:47:59.320
 almost no word

00:47:59.320 --> 00:47:59.980
 that we find in scripture

00:47:59.980 --> 00:48:01.539
 has a single

00:48:01.539 --> 00:48:02.700
 univocal meaning,

00:48:03.400 --> 00:48:03.760
 right?

00:48:04.240 --> 00:48:05.079
 And the same thing

00:48:05.079 --> 00:48:05.760
 with our language.

00:48:05.980 --> 00:48:06.079
 Like,

00:48:06.120 --> 00:48:07.200
 almost every word we use

00:48:07.200 --> 00:48:08.039
 could be used

00:48:08.039 --> 00:48:09.240
 in multiple different ways.

00:48:09.800 --> 00:48:10.220
 And so,

00:48:10.620 --> 00:48:11.100
 oftentimes,

00:48:11.519 --> 00:48:12.340
 sometimes it's not

00:48:12.340 --> 00:48:13.360
 100% clear

00:48:13.360 --> 00:48:14.740
 when he says

00:48:14.740 --> 00:48:15.800
 this,

00:48:16.579 --> 00:48:16.800
 because,

00:48:16.880 --> 00:48:16.980
 you know,

00:48:17.019 --> 00:48:17.720
 the word Lord

00:48:17.720 --> 00:48:18.240
 is used,

00:48:18.460 --> 00:48:19.480
 is applied to

00:48:19.480 --> 00:48:20.320
 secular rulers

00:48:20.320 --> 00:48:21.700
 in the Bible as well,

00:48:21.880 --> 00:48:22.240
 right?

00:48:22.239 --> 00:48:23.439
 or kings

00:48:23.439 --> 00:48:24.239
 and stuff like that.

00:48:24.559 --> 00:48:24.959
 And so,

00:48:25.559 --> 00:48:26.500
 I think someone

00:48:26.500 --> 00:48:28.379
 who is motivated

00:48:28.379 --> 00:48:29.819
 to,

00:48:30.199 --> 00:48:30.579
 for instance,

00:48:30.719 --> 00:48:31.599
 deny the divinity

00:48:31.599 --> 00:48:32.099
 of Jesus

00:48:32.099 --> 00:48:33.179
 can find

00:48:33.179 --> 00:48:34.319
 reasons

00:48:34.319 --> 00:48:35.139
 to weasel,

00:48:35.219 --> 00:48:36.019
 using the words,

00:48:36.139 --> 00:48:36.859
 to weasel out

00:48:36.859 --> 00:48:37.199
 of the,

00:48:37.519 --> 00:48:38.159
 I think,

00:48:38.500 --> 00:48:40.339
 what we're pointing out

00:48:40.339 --> 00:48:41.219
 is the obvious

00:48:41.219 --> 00:48:41.839
 conclusion.

00:48:42.579 --> 00:48:42.739
 Like,

00:48:42.779 --> 00:48:43.659
 if you did a systematic

00:48:43.659 --> 00:48:44.699
 theology of Jesus

00:48:44.699 --> 00:48:45.239
 and Lord

00:48:45.239 --> 00:48:46.239
 and looked at it,

00:48:46.259 --> 00:48:46.639
 you'd be like,

00:48:46.699 --> 00:48:46.839
 yeah,

00:48:46.919 --> 00:48:47.819
 he's claiming to be God,

00:48:47.879 --> 00:48:48.559
 he is God,

00:48:49.179 --> 00:48:49.439
 right?

00:48:49.500 --> 00:48:50.199
 He has authority.

00:48:50.199 --> 00:48:51.079
 But if you are

00:48:51.079 --> 00:48:52.519
 motivated to

00:48:52.519 --> 00:48:53.679
 find a way

00:48:53.679 --> 00:48:54.699
 to deny that,

00:48:54.799 --> 00:48:55.639
 you could weasel

00:48:55.639 --> 00:48:56.359
 with the words

00:48:56.359 --> 00:48:57.960
 to make them

00:48:57.960 --> 00:48:58.500
 sound like

00:48:58.500 --> 00:48:58.819
 you're saying

00:48:58.819 --> 00:48:59.500
 something else.

00:48:59.699 --> 00:49:00.719
 Like what I think

00:49:00.719 --> 00:49:01.179
 you're saying,

00:49:01.359 --> 00:49:02.279
 sometimes we have

00:49:02.279 --> 00:49:02.899
 to use

00:49:02.899 --> 00:49:04.819
 very specific,

00:49:05.079 --> 00:49:05.559
 distinct,

00:49:06.099 --> 00:49:07.099
 almost scientific

00:49:07.099 --> 00:49:07.819
 language

00:49:07.819 --> 00:49:08.899
 that has

00:49:08.899 --> 00:49:09.819
 one meaning

00:49:09.819 --> 00:49:11.480
 that we can say,

00:49:11.579 --> 00:49:11.779
 okay,

00:49:11.960 --> 00:49:12.839
 we're investing

00:49:12.839 --> 00:49:13.379
 this word

00:49:13.379 --> 00:49:14.359
 with this one meaning,

00:49:14.679 --> 00:49:15.879
 now we're using

00:49:15.879 --> 00:49:16.559
 it to describe

00:49:16.559 --> 00:49:17.059
 what we see

00:49:17.059 --> 00:49:17.559
 in scripture,

00:49:17.559 --> 00:49:18.779
 now we can

00:49:18.779 --> 00:49:19.519
 have a discussion

00:49:19.519 --> 00:49:20.920
 where there's

00:49:20.920 --> 00:49:23.259
 absolute clarity

00:49:23.259 --> 00:49:24.380
 based on this word.

00:49:25.719 --> 00:49:26.320
 Right.

00:49:26.840 --> 00:49:27.880
 It's smuggling

00:49:27.880 --> 00:49:29.320
 non-biblical

00:49:29.320 --> 00:49:29.840
 meanings

00:49:29.840 --> 00:49:30.699
 into a word,

00:49:30.860 --> 00:49:31.719
 into a phrase.

00:49:32.440 --> 00:49:33.420
 That was

00:49:33.420 --> 00:49:34.219
 the issue

00:49:34.219 --> 00:49:35.000
 at the Council

00:49:35.000 --> 00:49:35.719
 of Nicaea.

00:49:36.259 --> 00:49:36.579
 Tom?

00:49:36.940 --> 00:49:37.900
 Just to add to that,

00:49:38.000 --> 00:49:38.500
 I think also

00:49:38.500 --> 00:49:39.219
 that the preach,

00:49:39.340 --> 00:49:39.860
 it's not that

00:49:39.860 --> 00:49:40.279
 the scriptures

00:49:40.279 --> 00:49:41.380
 are insufficient

00:49:41.380 --> 00:49:41.920
 and the scriptures

00:49:41.920 --> 00:49:43.239
 don't interpret

00:49:43.239 --> 00:49:44.320
 each other

00:49:44.320 --> 00:49:45.199
 because they do.

00:49:45.380 --> 00:49:46.099
 They are sufficient.

00:49:46.099 --> 00:49:47.360
 it's that

00:49:47.360 --> 00:49:48.480
 there are,

00:49:49.360 --> 00:49:49.599
 you know,

00:49:49.679 --> 00:49:49.839
 like,

00:49:50.179 --> 00:49:50.699
 scripture doesn't

00:49:50.699 --> 00:49:51.099
 have the word

00:49:51.099 --> 00:49:51.799
 monotheism,

00:49:52.480 --> 00:49:53.480
 but we use

00:49:53.480 --> 00:49:54.039
 that term

00:49:54.039 --> 00:49:55.039
 to just characterize

00:49:55.039 --> 00:49:55.739
 what the scriptures

00:49:55.739 --> 00:49:56.460
 are saying.

00:49:57.199 --> 00:49:58.039
 And so the creeds,

00:49:58.139 --> 00:49:58.759
 like the Nicene Creed

00:49:58.759 --> 00:49:59.619
 could have just

00:49:59.619 --> 00:50:00.480
 done a big list

00:50:00.480 --> 00:50:01.339
 of Bible verses,

00:50:01.699 --> 00:50:01.960
 you know,

00:50:02.000 --> 00:50:02.539
 describing,

00:50:03.099 --> 00:50:03.799
 but then,

00:50:04.239 --> 00:50:04.659
 but that's not

00:50:04.659 --> 00:50:05.179
 the point of the creed.

00:50:05.299 --> 00:50:06.380
 The point of the creed

00:50:06.380 --> 00:50:07.159
 is to just quickly

00:50:07.159 --> 00:50:07.819
 summarize what

00:50:07.819 --> 00:50:08.179
 the scriptures

00:50:08.179 --> 00:50:08.799
 are saying

00:50:08.799 --> 00:50:09.559
 and sometimes

00:50:09.559 --> 00:50:10.799
 you need to

00:50:10.799 --> 00:50:11.639
 coin some words,

00:50:11.839 --> 00:50:12.059
 like,

00:50:12.279 --> 00:50:13.360
 I am monotheistic.

00:50:14.019 --> 00:50:14.900
 That's just a summary

00:50:14.900 --> 00:50:16.320
 of what Christians

00:50:16.320 --> 00:50:17.039
 should be.

00:50:17.280 --> 00:50:17.920
 Same as the word

00:50:17.920 --> 00:50:18.260
 trinity,

00:50:18.460 --> 00:50:18.940
 same as the word

00:50:18.940 --> 00:50:19.579
 homo lusios.

00:50:20.500 --> 00:50:22.180
 And that the Arians,

00:50:22.420 --> 00:50:23.599
 the Arians

00:50:23.599 --> 00:50:24.240
 tried to do this

00:50:24.240 --> 00:50:24.740
 in reverse

00:50:24.740 --> 00:50:26.500
 by putting phrases

00:50:26.500 --> 00:50:27.380
 together that

00:50:27.380 --> 00:50:28.260
 were misleading

00:50:28.260 --> 00:50:28.900
 about what the

00:50:28.900 --> 00:50:29.720
 scriptures were saying

00:50:29.720 --> 00:50:30.940
 and the Nicene Creed

00:50:30.940 --> 00:50:31.559
 was a response

00:50:31.559 --> 00:50:31.800
 to that.

00:50:31.920 --> 00:50:32.440
 And actually,

00:50:32.960 --> 00:50:35.099
 here's the response

00:50:35.099 --> 00:50:35.720
 that the Arians

00:50:35.720 --> 00:50:36.099
 couldn't,

00:50:36.180 --> 00:50:37.420
 they couldn't agree

00:50:37.420 --> 00:50:37.840
 with them.

00:50:37.960 --> 00:50:38.820
 It was an easy way

00:50:38.820 --> 00:50:39.620
 to differentiate

00:50:39.620 --> 00:50:40.660
 between two

00:50:40.660 --> 00:50:41.700
 different

00:50:41.700 --> 00:50:42.940
 understandings

00:50:42.940 --> 00:50:43.280
 of scripture,

00:50:43.440 --> 00:50:45.559
 one of which

00:50:45.559 --> 00:50:46.480
 is scriptural,

00:50:46.580 --> 00:50:46.920
 the other

00:50:46.920 --> 00:50:47.680
 says it is,

00:50:47.740 --> 00:50:48.600
 but it really isn't.

00:50:49.539 --> 00:50:50.240
 That's helpful,

00:50:50.360 --> 00:50:50.539
 yeah.

00:50:51.320 --> 00:50:51.880
 And so,

00:50:52.120 --> 00:50:53.280
 both sides

00:50:53.280 --> 00:50:53.920
 claim to believe

00:50:53.920 --> 00:50:54.320
 the Bible,

00:50:54.880 --> 00:50:56.900
 but when we start

00:50:56.900 --> 00:50:58.039
 talking about

00:50:58.039 --> 00:50:58.460
 the meaning

00:50:58.460 --> 00:50:59.100
 of the language

00:50:59.100 --> 00:50:59.559
 itself,

00:50:59.559 --> 00:51:00.260
 we need to start

00:51:00.260 --> 00:51:01.640
 using other words

00:51:01.640 --> 00:51:03.000
 that clarify,

00:51:04.000 --> 00:51:05.340
 but I would

00:51:05.340 --> 00:51:06.400
 still maintain

00:51:06.400 --> 00:51:07.160
 that the scripture

00:51:07.160 --> 00:51:07.920
 is sufficient,

00:51:08.160 --> 00:51:08.420
 so,

00:51:08.780 --> 00:51:09.599
 for all things

00:51:09.599 --> 00:51:10.780
 necessary for salvation.

00:51:11.619 --> 00:51:11.820
 So,

00:51:11.980 --> 00:51:12.360
 again,

00:51:12.500 --> 00:51:14.160
 we're trying

00:51:14.160 --> 00:51:15.300
 to interpret

00:51:15.300 --> 00:51:16.000
 the scripture

00:51:16.000 --> 00:51:18.840
 in light

00:51:18.840 --> 00:51:19.460
 to the fact

00:51:19.460 --> 00:51:20.860
 that there have

00:51:20.860 --> 00:51:21.500
 been saints

00:51:21.500 --> 00:51:21.920
 who have gone

00:51:21.920 --> 00:51:22.480
 before us

00:51:22.480 --> 00:51:23.039
 and we stand

00:51:23.039 --> 00:51:23.579
 on the shoulders

00:51:23.579 --> 00:51:24.320
 of giants

00:51:24.320 --> 00:51:25.260
 who have fought

00:51:25.260 --> 00:51:25.680
 this battle

00:51:25.680 --> 00:51:26.240
 and we can learn

00:51:26.240 --> 00:51:26.619
 from them.

00:51:27.059 --> 00:51:27.619
 You can imagine

00:51:27.619 --> 00:51:28.420
 someone who says,

00:51:28.500 --> 00:51:28.840
 I'm just going

00:51:28.840 --> 00:51:29.099
 to go in the

00:51:29.099 --> 00:51:30.619
 corner in the Bible

00:51:30.619 --> 00:51:31.360
 with myself

00:51:31.360 --> 00:51:32.519
 and I'm going

00:51:32.519 --> 00:51:33.280
 to read Romans

00:51:33.280 --> 00:51:33.639
 and I'm going

00:51:33.639 --> 00:51:34.039
 to see what it

00:51:34.039 --> 00:51:34.800
 really means.

00:51:35.380 --> 00:51:36.160
 What it really

00:51:36.159 --> 00:51:36.500
 means.

00:51:37.239 --> 00:51:37.920
 I'm not

00:51:37.920 --> 00:51:38.440
 prejudiced

00:51:38.440 --> 00:51:39.000
 like with all

00:51:39.000 --> 00:51:39.359
 those other

00:51:39.359 --> 00:51:39.960
 people throughout

00:51:39.960 --> 00:51:40.559
 church history.

00:51:41.059 --> 00:51:41.699
 That's a foolish

00:51:41.699 --> 00:51:42.239
 thing to do.

00:51:42.839 --> 00:51:43.920
 We need to

00:51:43.920 --> 00:51:44.879
 recognize that

00:51:44.879 --> 00:51:45.819
 we learn

00:51:45.819 --> 00:51:46.339
 from other

00:51:46.339 --> 00:51:46.759
 people.

00:51:46.940 --> 00:51:47.279
 We rely

00:51:47.279 --> 00:51:47.759
 upon other

00:51:47.759 --> 00:51:48.099
 people.

00:51:49.779 --> 00:51:50.420
 Any final...

00:51:50.420 --> 00:51:50.799
 That's why

00:51:50.799 --> 00:51:51.679
 it says in the Bible

00:51:51.679 --> 00:51:52.440
 it talks about

00:51:52.440 --> 00:51:54.659
 pastors and

00:51:54.659 --> 00:51:55.299
 teachers.

00:51:58.960 --> 00:51:59.559
 Teachers.

00:52:00.079 --> 00:52:00.279
 Yeah.

00:52:00.719 --> 00:52:01.399
 We need

00:52:01.399 --> 00:52:02.519
 faithful teachers,

00:52:02.859 --> 00:52:03.779
 but we don't

00:52:03.779 --> 00:52:04.579
 put teachers

00:52:04.579 --> 00:52:05.019
 up here.

00:52:06.159 --> 00:52:06.799
 Again,

00:52:07.199 --> 00:52:07.859
 the scripture

00:52:07.859 --> 00:52:08.799
 is the highest

00:52:08.799 --> 00:52:09.319
 jurisdiction.

00:52:10.019 --> 00:52:11.139
 So this is

00:52:11.139 --> 00:52:12.019
 sort of a...

00:52:12.019 --> 00:52:12.739
 As we dive

00:52:12.739 --> 00:52:13.279
 into the

00:52:13.279 --> 00:52:13.879
 specifics,

00:52:14.339 --> 00:52:14.980
 I want us

00:52:14.980 --> 00:52:15.519
 to keep this

00:52:15.519 --> 00:52:16.139
 framework in

00:52:16.139 --> 00:52:16.480
 mind.

00:52:16.980 --> 00:52:17.639
 Because to

00:52:17.639 --> 00:52:18.440
 elevate the

00:52:18.440 --> 00:52:19.279
 norma normata

00:52:19.279 --> 00:52:20.039
 to this level,

00:52:20.159 --> 00:52:20.440
 I think

00:52:20.440 --> 00:52:22.319
 dishonors those

00:52:22.319 --> 00:52:23.239
 who actually

00:52:23.239 --> 00:52:24.199
 were appealing

00:52:24.199 --> 00:52:24.819
 to the scriptures

00:52:24.819 --> 00:52:26.359
 in their defense

00:52:26.359 --> 00:52:28.019
 of the truth

00:52:28.019 --> 00:52:28.500
 they were seeking

00:52:28.500 --> 00:52:32.760
 to guard the

00:52:32.760 --> 00:52:33.559
 church with.

00:52:33.679 --> 00:52:34.480
 So let me

00:52:34.480 --> 00:52:35.139
 pray and then

00:52:35.139 --> 00:52:36.679
 we'll go

00:52:36.679 --> 00:52:37.059
 downstairs.

00:52:37.239 --> 00:52:37.699
 Our Father in

00:52:37.699 --> 00:52:38.079
 heaven, we

00:52:38.079 --> 00:52:38.659
 thank you for

00:52:38.659 --> 00:52:39.599
 your faithfulness.

00:52:39.820 --> 00:52:40.559
 Thank you for

00:52:40.559 --> 00:52:44.300
 your ways,

00:52:44.420 --> 00:52:45.019
 for men and

00:52:45.019 --> 00:52:46.079
 women who

00:52:46.079 --> 00:52:46.780
 have gone

00:52:46.780 --> 00:52:47.500
 before us,

00:52:48.059 --> 00:52:49.400
 who have

00:52:49.400 --> 00:52:51.360
 been examples

00:52:51.360 --> 00:52:51.960
 to us of

00:52:51.960 --> 00:52:52.519
 faithfulness.

00:52:52.639 --> 00:52:53.199
 Will we walk

00:52:53.199 --> 00:52:53.440
 in their

00:52:53.440 --> 00:52:53.780
 footsteps,

00:52:54.039 --> 00:52:55.159
 Lord, as they

00:52:55.159 --> 00:52:55.659
 have walked

00:52:55.659 --> 00:52:56.099
 with you.

00:52:56.099 --> 00:52:57.039
 We pray this

00:52:57.039 --> 00:52:57.339
 in Jesus'

00:52:57.500 --> 00:52:57.679
 name.

00:52:58.119 --> 00:52:58.360
 Amen.